• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 hours ago

    unrelated but I just want to say theres like 4 separate comments using the word “TrumpID” to describe this age verification, and i think this would be a great way to mock it just like how conservatives called the aca “ObamaCare”

    • Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Except it’s more ZuckID, since Meta was behind the “grassroots” campaigns and wrote the script “representatives” are using globally.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You misunderstand, TrumpID is the company that will soon be created that will be the mandatory provider for all OS to use (and pay licence fees to).

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    palintir, meta, google are all behind it. it serves 2 purposes; silencing dissidents and TRACKING women/potential mothers as brood mares.

  • Jarvis2323@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Since all TV’s are smart TV’s with an OS this means age verification to watch TV? I think that’s a message that will resonate with the average consumer on what is wrong with this bill

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They cant even define an OS. Do i need a fucking login for my wifi fridge and toaster. Such a stupid ffucking law.

    • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Why does a fridge need to connect to the Internet? Or a toaster? Why does my toothbrush need Bluetooth?

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        OK, how about my surveillance cam? NAS appliance? My WiFi light controller? Network switch? They all run Linux.

        • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Well now you have to provide ID to use any of those.

          This is just another form of control and a potential verified data stream for governments/corporations/marketers.

          How can you prove that internet traffic is a human and not a bot? ID verification.

          How can you generate more user data? Force them to provide ID for every device that is connected.

          Want to control piracy? Easy with OS level ID requirements.

            • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 minutes ago

              They will repurpose the same security chips that make digital payments and OS verification soon enough. Then you cannot bypass digital ID because it is on the hardware level.

              Seems they are starting with software compliance to see who will voluntarily do their dirty work for them. Assume that M$ and App£€ will comply while making it difficult for smaller independent developers to comply thus removing any privacy options.

              Same with Win11, force people to upgrade working tech because it lack hardware security chip support. Call it “anti-piracy” or “security updates” and force people to comply.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Primary Josh Gottheimer. Write in anyone else against him. Vote against him or withhold voting at all in the general.

    Do not signal that this is tolerated.

  • Eggyhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Don’t want to compete with a potentially capable Linux? Pay the government to make it illegal!

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There’s already being work done to add an optional age-attestation in systemd.

      And note that none of the laws proposed so far are actually verifying age, they’re only requiring someone to enter it. That’s attestation, not verification. Verification will be the next tightening of the screw.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    12 hours ago

    There’s NOTHING Safer than having the Epstein Class KNOW where Kids are and WHEN they’re Home Alone!

    -US Politicians!

    • nullify3112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well they could do it the right way where, for example, you go to your city hall to get a certificate of age where they check your ID. Then some cryptography happens so you only enter a public key from that certificate on a website or OS to verify your age.

      The website or OS doesn’t check your ID. City hall doesn’t know your browsing history.

      But I’m not fooling myself, that’s not the point of such a law.

    • VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      10 hours ago

      💯 don’t call it age verification - that’s just what the unmasked scooby-doo villain is still hiding behind.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “Key questions remain unanswered, such as the definition of “operating system provider,” the type of verification required, the focus on major commercial platforms, and the potential scope beyond them.”

    I guarantee this bill is unenforceable. Cars, phones, traffic lights all have have computers with operating systems. All modern tech has an operating system of some sort. Also how do you even verify age? If my laptop is offline can I just not use it because it can’t confirm my id? What about tech that never goes online but has an OS, like a calculator? I can’t believe microsoft and apple are not lobbying against this. Who becomes liable if an “underage” person is accidentally given access or if access is denied to an “of age” person. I can just imagine an emt frantically looking for their driver’s license so they can use the computerized defibrillator.

    • nullify3112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What is this argument? You and I both know they want this age verification at the OS level for personal computing devices: phones, tablets and computers, maybe watches.

      Is this really what’s going to kill this law? Semantics?

    • jtrek@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Microsoft is probably salivating at the idea of being the only legal OS provider.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Microsoft and Apple. The internet will only allow OSs from large American corporations.

        I’d like to see the rest of the world say “fuck it” and carry on as before, leaving the Americans to censor themselves. But governments around the world are suddenly rushing to implement very similar terrible laws. It smells very coordinated.

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          Yeah, governments all over are trying to implement the same shit, and I agree it’s coordinated. Many governments are also looking seriously at stepping back from reliance on US big tech firms though. Not that homegrown oppression and surveillance is any better.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Meta is funding a lot of the lobbyists pushing for age verification laws. Uncoincidentally, Meta both owns a stake in a company providing identity verification as a service, and serves to benefit from not having to moderate its own platforms.

          • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            And meta had a pretty big chance of just getting banned from being used by minors in places around the world, so it might not work out as hoped.

        • Lemmyng@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          But don’t some of these larger orgs fund Linux distros? Like Red Hat with Fedora?

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It feels like a Mr. Smith Goes to Washington display would solve this.

      Just bring everything that has an operating system in it into the room. Cars, boats, planes, construction equipment, tractors, factories, knock off game consoles, literally every server on the internet.

      Show them the ridiculousness of this and maybe we’ll get dragged out by police and charged with contempt of congress

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Don’t give them even better ideas. To you it sounds ridiculous, to them it sounds like “we can ban people we don’t like from using modern technology by invalidating their age verification”

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If my laptop is offline can I just not use it because it can’t confirm my id?

      Yes. The powers at be will stop at nothing to take more, and more, and more power away from you. This is human nature.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The problem comes when a public school’s IT department is deciding whether to go with a FOSS option, or a commercial OS. As the IT team has full control over the FOSS OS, the school will be held liable as the OS provider. They will select a commercial OS to avoid liability under these idiot laws.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The same way the next laws will keep kids safe. When you leave your front door, you will have to drop your pants so the TSA can check your asshole. It’s necessary. You know. To keep kids safe.

      /s

      🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

    • jalkasieni@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This is about protecting the entrenched players in the OS games; Microsoft, Google and Apple. The likely end play for all this is the erosion of personal computing so they can rent (and therefore control) all the compute available to you, so you don’t get uppity and think of running your own AI, which they believe will be as integral to everyday life as the internet is today.

    • Zier@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Safe? Never. But it will help the pedophiles find more children online. Sickos!

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t even understand safe from what? Seeing titties? That is not bad and needs to be part of any growing up human, we’ve been all thru this, and we clearly see what happens to people who don’t/were banned from normal childhood. All sorts of freaks.

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Everyone in this comment section, you’re just gonna take this? Its been time, but if this is what motivates you to throw bricks at politicians then lets go

  • LostWanderer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Ugh, this is so disgusting! They desperately want control over things they should never have! I’ve shared my opinion will all three of my representatives.

  • marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Totally unenforceable. You going to prevent people from downloading open-source, noncompliant Linux from Asia or Europe? Good luck.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They can certainly try. I don’t put it past them to create a great firewall. I don’t envy whoever has to maintain those blacklists though.

      • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Ill throw my data on an offshore vps, load my lappy up with a dummy normal looking win 11 install, and drive my ass across to Canada if it keeps getting worse.

        Fuck that.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You going to prevent people from downloading open-source, noncompliant Linux from Asia or Europe?

      That’s the real plan, I suspect.