The funny part is where you think Republicans would abide by their own ban, if not outright reverse it, the second they have a chance to reverse power.

Their “facial recognition” ends up just being a binary switch on a light detector

You can run anything you want in startup, go to run and type shell:startup and put the batch in the folder that pops up

He can’t just “declare“ a ceasefire unless Iran agrees to it, too.

I mean, he can. It’s called surrender.

Also Israel won’t give a shit anyway so his word doesn’t mean anything.

But who writes the computer program?

Its ok tho, there’s no recession, becuz stock marmket!!! 11!1!11!!!

28 years ago

The only things people were doing with their cell phones was making calls, maybe a couple texts if you could afford it, and making those custom ring tones that Motorola let you do.

“Parents Decide Act”

Yet text of it has basically nothing about parents in it, just government data collection lol

AM allows multiple to talk and also allows edge-case signals to be received. FM and digital is way more sensitive to weak signals being washed out where as even a washed out AM carrier can often be picked out of the noise enough to realize someone has a problem.

the 3 downvoters are the men who can’t find the clit to start with

well neither did Obama personally write the affordable care act, but here we are

unrelated but I just want to say theres like 4 separate comments using the word “TrumpID” to describe this age verification, and i think this would be a great way to mock it just like how conservatives called the aca “ObamaCare”

Don’t give them even better ideas. To you it sounds ridiculous, to them it sounds like “we can ban people we don’t like from using modern technology by invalidating their age verification”

That’d be cool and all but my city strapped them to 35ft tall traffic light poles

“You figure out what was wrong with PLC7 yet?”

“Nah, TrumpCard ID systems are down, can’t log in.”

“Cool, guess the city is going without running water tonight.”

Without the document text, who knows. But I would not consider it a stretch for a court challenge to interpret “operating system” as “any software that allows a person to interact with computing or electronic hardware”. Which would blanket cover all embedded devices.

bait = grabbed lol

Yes, next question.