Wow, I’m impressed that the ride-or-die overall 38% finally cracked.

Of the economy. I’m sure his loyal ~38% is still in there overall, minus a blip for the gas prices.

Yeah. I looked up his track record a few years ago when he was in the running, and he’s always got, as you said, a reasonable idea, but then he gets about two links of thought into it and it turns into completely deranged nonsense. It starts with “let’s clean up our waterways” and ends with “I eat bones and shit ghosts”

I see it as crowdsourcing info like for that vaccine reporting tool — you’re ending up with the worst of the worst weirdest things that have no necessary correlation with the drugs. The researchers even went as far to acknowledge that phrase frequency doesn’t indicate that GLP-1s are even causing these symptoms, but the headline leads to the contrary.

What are the other comorbidities that occur with uses indicated for GLP-1s? Not gonna get them ruled out by Redditors doing a keyboard exam.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania used AI to analyze more than five years of posts from nearly 70,000 Reddit users, according to a report published in Medical Xpress.

A solid way to go about anything, of course.

Get Bigballs back and tell him to hire like it’s the Danbury Trashers.

The US is hosting the World Cup from June to July with Mexico and Canada

“Mexico will pay for it, folks…”

DMX is back!

They’re gonna hold up about as well as their footwear.

Warning: super long read. But a very interesting genealogy of free bread! I thoroughly enjoyed this.

Also, why I hate Olive Garden:

Horner’s demonic calculation for how many slices or rolls each table’s basket should contain is [Number of diners] + 1. Unevenly divisible bread creates “a tension that I really enjoy.”

But does it protect ya neck

Students often carry misconceptions about coursework. They may view an instructor as an opponent standing in the way of the grade they want. And they see “getting the right answers” as the goal of education because that’s how you secure that grade.

Pedagogy aside, this is not entirely untrue in the lower division, at least on an institutional level. It’s usually the institution propping instructors up to stand in the way. They are told “you have to meet these learning outcomes, so these assignments have to do X, Y, and Z” and turns out X, Y, and Z are bullshit, but it meets accreditation standards if the class is audited. I taught rhetoric and it had to be explicitly Aristotelian. It blew chunks, nobody liked it or really understood it, but it was what the department justified to the institution for accreditation purposes.

I hated giving grades. I wanted to see continual improvement rather than final products. With a gun to my head I wouldn’t go back.

Heck, my surface pro 3 makes a great Linux machine. Still tweaking it but the touchscreen works just fine with Mint, so even an old one could probably do just fine.

I usually don’t, since they’re getting downvoted already, unless they start doubling down on a terrifically bad opinion. For posts, it’s typically because it’s promotional or just bad content/bait/propaganda. This is all subjective, of course, so I try not to do it often.

They should ask ChatGPT for tips on tax fraud.

“You’re really taking initiative here! Let’s consider how to invest those funds instead into vans full of fertilizer and punch up a manifesto!”

Standwipe gang rise up