Just because it has decreased doesn’t mean that rape and sexual assaults don’t happen to teenagers and children anymore.
Yet again, you’re missing the point. This conclusion was already stated by countless of oppositions to your argument.
The main point is the fact that your research is invalid to explain the status quo - its the logic thats the problem not that “rape has somehow evaporated from existence”.
The point of the post is that a pregnant 12 year old is most likely a rape victim and finding the rapist should take precedence over preventing a child from getting an abortion.
Yet again, you’re missing the point. This conclusion was already stated by countless of oppositions to your argument.
The main point is the fact that your research is invalid to explain the status quo - its the logic thats the problem not that “rape has somehow evaporated from existence”.
The point of the post is that a pregnant 12 year old is most likely a rape victim and finding the rapist should take precedence over preventing a child from getting an abortion.
The data in question does not support that point.
That doesn’t mean the point is invalid.
Including this particular data detracts from this point. Either find a point that this data does support, or don’t use this particular data.