snoons@lemmy.ca to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 days agoGitHub Outages Since Microslop Acquisitionlemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up1434arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1429arrow-down1external-linkGitHub Outages Since Microslop Acquisitionlemmy.zipsnoons@lemmy.ca to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square39linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBigDiction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·22 days agoReal triple 99.9% is pretty hard to achieve on a massive service.
minus-squarejust_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·21 days agoThat’s not the point of the post tho? It was hitting 99.9% before acquisition. Unless you want to say that github only became massive after MS acquisition
minus-squareBigDiction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 days agoI don’t know anything concrete, but MS may report downtime differently, and have more strict requirements for reporting downtime. I’ve seen it happen at another ‘start up’ that got acquired and suddenly started reporting way more downtime events than prior to acquisition.
minus-squarejust_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·21 days agoThat actually may be true, but honestly my personal/anecdotal evidence also shows github being down more since atleast a couple of years.
Real triple 99.9% is pretty hard to achieve on a massive service.
That’s not the point of the post tho?
It was hitting 99.9% before acquisition. Unless you want to say that github only became massive after MS acquisition
I don’t know anything concrete, but MS may report downtime differently, and have more strict requirements for reporting downtime.
I’ve seen it happen at another ‘start up’ that got acquired and suddenly started reporting way more downtime events than prior to acquisition.
That actually may be true, but honestly my personal/anecdotal evidence also shows github being down more since atleast a couple of years.