• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle

  • The problem with that approach is that the “rugged energy individualist” idea would only a thin veneer and as soon as you scratch the surface you see it isn’t true.

    Currently technology solar isn’t able to affordably support the amount of energy consumption most Americans have or want. It would be either astronomically expensive for a single American household to have enough energy systems to be completely 100% self sufficient (in most States in the Union) or the American household would have to drastically reduce its energy consumption. I don’t know if you know us Americans, but we don’t like to cut back on anything.

    The feasible technology we have today that is still expensive, but at least attainable by many, is for 30% to 70% household energy generation. The remainder (depending on the time of year) comes from our socialized system of central energy generation and distribution (the power grid).

    I say this as someone with solar panels and EVs that has gone carbon free energy at home. Its expensive for the equipment and installation and still doesn’t cover all the energy needs year-round. Nine months out of the year we have no energy bills. Three months of the year, we do. That’s just physics and the limits of my wallet.







  • I see. You wanna go ad hominem.

    I’m not sure you understand the definition of an ad hominem attack. Nothing I said to you was ad hominem. I asked if you practice what you preach. Unless you consider what you preach to be objectionable then no ad hominem language was used. Even if you do consider your own position objectionable making my questions to you insulting, it is unreasonable for me to expect you’d be arguing a position you yourself don’t agree with, so even then nothing I said would be ad hominem.

    We buy very few newly produced goods, preferring estate sales and thrift stores.

    Those are the products of mass production and economies of scale. Simply acquiring them secondhand doesn’t wash away their provenance. If you were to get your way and eliminate companies that exercise economies of scale, the mass produced goods you’re buying from estate sales and thrift stores would quickly vanish as a source for you to buy more.

    I am done discussing any of this with you at this point.

    That is your choice, of course. I hope you have a nice day.









  • The extra context from the article makes this a much more human response from both people:

    Sam, who has CPR training, asked her supervisor if she could assist. The supervisor watched the woman heaving her weight into the man’s chest and gave no response.

    “I start sobbing and said, ‘I want to help, please!’ I know she’s going to get tired and need to be subbed out,” Sam told The Western Edge.

    The supervisor, who Sam perceived to be in shock, had a simple reply: “It has to be management or safety team. Please get back to work.”

    “I need to help,” Sam said.

    “Just turn around and not look. Let’s get back to work,” Sam recalled the manager saying.

    This likely wasn’t entirely some cold calculated policy cooked up in a conference room by lawyers or executives that. The supervisor themselves was clearly not prepared to be dealing with just watching someone die at work under their management. The supervisor was stunned and trying to come up with an answer to a situation they were not prepared for. I don’t think they acted this way out of indifference or malice, but just being unprepared.

    I’ll say Sam was also stunned and unprepared. Why ask permission to help someone? I would like to think I’d just run over a do it. However, just like the supervisor, Sam feel back on asking for permission to help from a superior instead of acting. I don’t blame Sam at all in asking. Sam was stunned too. I would be stunned too.

    We’re also left with only a partial account of what happened. Were there other management and safety team members attending to the victim by this point? We don’t know. Again, no blame to Sam, but I also don’t see the supervisor’s reported statement automatically as cold-hearted indifference.