It’s not “The Left” hating “The Left” it’s Communists and Liberals hating each other.
- 0 Posts
- 40 Comments
Then they explode and he complains about the mess and it’s spilling all over the floor.
“And no one wants to help me clean up the mess, nasty people who said they were friends. But don’t worry, I put down a few paper towels, and now the floor is much less sticky. So much less sticky than anyone thought possible. And I did it all by myself because no one else could do it.”
null@piefed.nullspace.lolto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Copilot can't exit vimEnglish
81·21 hours agoI prefer micro, but I never use it because my brain just autotypes nano and then it’s too late I’m already in
You justify attacks on his character and ignore why he is targeted
I have explained exactly why he’s targetted several times now.
I consider them attacks against his character, of course. And I outlined exactly why they are attacking his character.
I asked you for examples of them attacking him based on his “progressive views”.
That’s your claim.
What’s your strongest example of a Democrat attacking Hasan for his progressive views?
under attack by his closest aligning party, because he is threatening right wing democrats position, and gamesmanship of the vote
So then we agree that this comment was either nonsense or bait.
i don’t care about Hassan, it’s not about him, he is just yet another example of the larger effort the democratic party expends to fight against the progressive base from getting control.
And yet you say that pushing back against him trying to inject himself into the part takes significant effort from the party that could be devoted to other things.
If we agree that Hasan is a bad example of a person they’d want in the coalition, then who are these other “progressive” figures they are spending so much effort fighting against?
Again, they are not spending significant effort “attacking” Hasan that’s keeping them from doing other things. That’s a fantasy.
- He has literally talked about the end goal being Communism. He’s an ML.
- This is largely an opinion peice, and also does not draw the conclusion that Democrats lost because they didn’t cater to MLs
- Cool opinion
I didn’t say dems are perfect, or haven’t been dropping the ball.
I’m making the case that courting someone who’s goal is to promote communism and who’s anti-liberal views are completely at odds with the party is obviously not of interest or a good move for the Dems.
first, not ml’s, progressives.
Hasan is an open ML, and you’re saying the Dems need people sharing his views to get votes.
second, they need the more votes, and courting the right is insufficient. that’s backed by their internal report, and their losses with their preferred candidates.
Source?
third, they are not doing their job because they do not counter the republican party. they waste their time instead maintaining power of corporate democrats
Do not counter the Republican party how? They don’t have the seats…
“This is totally true, but I’m not going to give a single example. But trust me, it totally is”.
Yawn.
There’s no such pattern. You’re talking out of your ass.
Didn’t they literally just file a bill to get him removed…?
Man, you’re really all over the place.
So you think Dems need to court MLs to win elections, but you can’t actually back that up with anything. But that if they don’t, they are wasting effort and not doing their job.
What a mess of an opinion.
they make concessions with their own fucking base or voter apathy rises.
Any evidence that voter apathy due to the Dems not being ML enough is costing them elections?
Again, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog.
Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”
again, they are spending more effort into attacking someone who is a representative of the left pull of the democratic base.
instead of doing their fucking job.
By what metric? Sounds like you’re just mad that Democrats rightfully don’t want to include someone in their movement who’s core ideology is completely incompatible.


Oh no, some random tweet?? Whatever will I do!
Have you actually used any braincells to engage with it? Or did you see it, race over here to comment, and forget to actually think?