fonix232

It’s a DRESSING technique. The animal is presumed dead at this stage.

Not really. This is a super quick and relatively safe way to get all the guts and inedible bits out. How’s a sharp rock better?

To date I still quote this whenever even marginally relevant.

Why is even the DNC allowing them to be in the party? Party membership isn’t as simple as claiming “heh I’m party X now” and donezo…

Is he healing Jeffrey Epstein here?

Have a wank, have a Kit Kat. Rinse, repeat.

I can help with the latter, got 12 tonnes of the stuff as a deal recently

Corporations should be able to voice their opinions, support (in the sense of “I think this new regulation is a good/bad idea because […]”, not in the sense of $$$$), and such about legislation.

Corporations should not be allowed to influence those legislations beyond the aforementioned, by providing $$$/favours/kickbacks to politicians.

Just like people, companies can have opinions, but that’s it. No further influence.

Not wanting to say something is hardly the same as supporting it, though, isn’t it?

But that’s besides the point. The very same people who took her silence as support of genocide, implied that somehow Trump would be better.

But hey, it all worked out, right? Y’all assholes have a clean conscience not voting for someone who didn’t say the magic words, because it’s so much fucking better right now! Oh wait, it fucking isn’t because Trump isn’t just dependant on the money Israel funnels into the defense companies of the US, he’s literally in their fucking pocket, doing whatever the fuck Bibi wants to get out of jail free.

Perfection is the enemy of good, as this example has shown. Kamala wasn’t a perfect candidate, and yes, the Dems should’ve picked someone better, BUT WAS IT REALLY FUCKING WORTH IT to allow Trump to won just to rub the DNC’s nose into the mess they made, and essentially starting WW3 within a year of his election? Does it soothe your soul that you didn’t vote for someone you were TOLD by the enemies of your state is a genocide supporter, and by that, allowing someone who directly supports genocide AND raped women - including underage ones - to win? Did you win this fucking purity test? Enjoy it then. Enjoy being king on the hill of rubble. And once the dust settles you can get a fancy pin, showing everyone how you’re directly responsible for the shit the whole world is in.

While she was far from being an ideal candidate, and the Dems most definitely fumbled the entire election, let’s not forget the massive Russian bot campaign amplified by the clueless tankies, spreading that bullshit “Kamala is for genocide” crap… which was loud enough to turn a large chunk of average voters away from even voting. If not for that incredibly successful propaganda campaign, Kamala would’ve won, just by a smidge, but she would’ve come out on top.

You’re misunderstanding the point of AGPL.

Regular GPL software CAN be run over a network, but because the binary of the software isn’t distributed - only an interface is provided to the software itself - the host isn’t obligated to provide the source code. A lot of software hosts used this loophole to get around sharing their modifications to GPL licenced software, killing the main point.

That’s why AGPL was developed - to protect hosted software. AGPL requires the host to provide source to anyone who has access to the service, not just the binary.

GPL - if I have the binary, I must be granted access to the source

AGPL - if I can access the software, I must be granted access to the source