YappyMonotheist

Bretty cool and stylish. 😎

That’s a WATCH!

I agree but idk how unpopular the “substance over form” take is, lol.

It’s all about discernment, as it is with everything. You can’t take everything seriously, you can’t take nothing seriously, basically.

If you do have parts of both, it’s not a “new sex” but an extremely rare condition (intersex, Klinefelter’s syndrome and others) that will almost certainly come with handicaps (infertility, hormonal imbalance, gynaecomastia…). People with Down’s aren’t “new brained/chromosomed” either, right?

I’ve known somewhat prosocial and virtuous homeless addicts, so idk. I think some people just decide to be evil, whatever educational background and intellectual capacities they may have.

Would that make it okay, morally and for the healthy development of a kid’s psyche and ideology? 🤔

Anyone who thought the capitalist in bed with Washington and even Musk was gonna do anything good for anyone besides himself and whoever makes him richer is seriously detached from the world/intellectually challenged.

Yeah but Trump has everything under control and the numbers are BIG, the biggest anyone has ever seen, so he has more than earned a little rest, you filthy commies! 🦅

They use “gender” to avoid these uhh controversies. Personally, I avoid the word unless absolutely necessary.

You’re uhh interesting, and that makes you memorable! But yeah, crazy story. 😅

Lots of all-or-nothing thinking in your post…

I thought you were maybe just shitposting when you posted about it some time ago… 🥲

And yes, yes it is. Lots of prostitutes and Johns in this world, though.

Westerners feel that way when the propaganda/ideology is threatened. They also often have issues not thinking in all or nothing terms, so they need these dichotomies.

Seeing from the heavily upvoted comments removed by the mods, this ain’t changing anytime soon, lol.

Oh yeah the man was a prophet of peace, I’m not putting it on him. 👍

Does left and right just mean prosocial Vs antisocial? What do these directions used as political labels even mean? Are they useful labels?

Completely eyeballed it but I included every Western imperialist project that was done with Bible in hand and chanting variations of “Deus Vult”, so that’s large chunks of Asia, most of Africa, all of Latin America, and every Western incursion on West Asia from the Crusades to Iran today. And let’s not forget the pagan persecution in the West itself by the Romans. That’s a shit ton of people through the ages, right?

Jesus, by far. The people who have been murdered in his name is probably close to or over a good billion, right?

He’s not really a “foundational figure of Christianity” though, his image was just co-opted by the Roman empire which then created the religion also co-opting the actual “Jewish revival” Jesus was at the core of (bringing the fundamentals of monotheism back into mind and expanding the teachings to everyone, not just a small select community).

It’s literally that simple, but many Westerners who choose to be one of/on the side of the world’s villains don’t seem to grasp it and I don’t know why.

Recognising you have a problem is the first and biggest step IMO. Even outside of the realm of mental health, really: the difference between a moral person and an amoral one is often simply the recognition/blindness to objective/unarguable rights and wrongs. Once you recognise that, the change usually comes by itself (and if the brain isn’t cooperating, there’s medication for that!), but you gotta want it. In the case of morals, you have to be proud enough that you won’t allow yourself to be a lesser man/woman, or pious enough not to warrant God’s hatred, or both.