Allow me to introduce you to:

Friend that sends 3+ min voice messages in a group chat and ask for feedback about it.

👍

Indeed! Nobody does, but the fact that you still refuse to answer it, is an answer by itself; an answer that proves my point.

You sitouts really are all the same, huh?

Keep dodging the question, that’s all you can do. You are the same as any other sitouts. Again, enjoy your pedopresident.

They’ll keep crying wolf until no election theft claim has credibility. That way, when they actually steal the elections, nobody will believe it because they’ll think it’s another wolf cry.

Was harris better than pedohitler, or not? Because that’s the only thing that counts. You could have voted for the better option and start working from there. Instead you decided to not vote. If you abstain, you are ok with either result, that’s just how it is

You keep dodging the question, which makes me think the answer is no. It really looks like you are ok with pedohitler.

We use it when, for any reason, a person who could easily use something related to their field, doesn’t use it. What it means is that if someone who could be using something because they know how it works, isn’t using it, there must be a reason.

In Spanish, we have a saying: “En casa de herrero, cuchara de palo”.
A rough translation would be “in the blacksmith’s house you’ll find wood spoons”. It’s not a new thing, it’s been like that since ancient times.

Yes it is, and you are not offering any arguments to prove your point, so yup, you are as guilty as those who voted for him. Enjoy your pedopresident.

Schroedinger’s strait. Open and close at the same time.

I believe so. But do you write cringe shit (like the post we’re talking in) on facebook? I think you probably don’t, hence my point stands.

Whenever I see classic emojis in a sentence, I believe it’s some 50-something years old writing some cringe shit (you can say shit on the internet, by the way) for their friends in facebook.

The more land they illegally claim, the greater they get.

I don’t think they are intelligent if they are conservative. Conservatism is objectively bad for the collective. Supporting it means, ultimately, hurting the planet even to the point of making it uninhabitable. And if you think that you, with all the money in the world, can survive in a world like that, then you are not very intelligent.

They are selfish, and they might have some skills. But I don’t think they can be called intelligent when they lack the critical thinking skills to question the most basic concepts of conservatism.

Nah. You might consider yourself as not intelligent (that’s your opinion, I can’t say since I don’t know you), but you have empathy. And it’s that, empathy (or lack of), what we should link to conservatism. I’ll take a dumb but empathetic person over a smart but psychopathic asshole every time.

from a logical standpoint, conservatism is lacking any kind of sense or logic. I think it’s safe to assume that, in order to follow blindly an idea that crumbles as soon as you critically think about it, you have to lack the ability to critically think.

What I think tho is that it’s empathy what we should link to intelligence (or whatever you want to call the skill set that allows you to question and critizice everything).

Conservatism is a lack of empathy (which comes with a lack of said “intelligence”).

Breaking the law several times?

Kidnapping another country’s president?

Deporting every single non-white person they find?

Bombing a school full of children?

That’s all fine and well, but god forsake he touches our shitty imaginary friend, THERE we draw the line!!

MAGAts don’t deserve a place in society.

You guys in the UK better burn any copies of Game of Thrones you might have around. The show wasn’t that good as to be worth the jail time.

On a side note, is the UK alright?

You made a choice, and that choice was saying that none was acceptable, hence both were ok to win. Was harris better than pedohitler, or not? Because that’s the only thing that counts. You could have voted for the better option and start working from there. Instead you decided to not vote. If you abstain, you are ok with either result, that’s just how it is.

Well, if you didn’t vote against him, you can’t say you’re against what he’s doing. You made a choice, and that choice was saying that none was acceptable, hence both were ok to win. Was harris better than pedohitler, or not? Because that’s the only thing that counts. You could have voted for the better option and start working from there. Instead you decided to not vote. If you abstain, you are ok with either result, that’s just how it is. You can’t complain of a result if you didn’t vote.