Hofmaimaier@feddit.org to NoSafetySmokingFirst@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agonot til notfeddit.orgimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up1107arrow-down12
arrow-up1105arrow-down1imagenot til notfeddit.orgHofmaimaier@feddit.org to NoSafetySmokingFirst@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 days agoAt least they wrote “'til” with one L. I’ll give them a pass here, as it’s an increasingly rare bit of adequacy.
minus-squareegrets@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·20 hours agoI don’t know whether it ever took hold in the US, but “till” without an apostrophe is valid in the UK and not only is it not a contraction of “until”, it predates it and is the root of the word.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours agoThanks! TIL :)
minus-squaretomenzgg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 hours agoIt’s also valid (and the standard form) in the U. S. But the assumption it’s a contraction of “until” has been around for a while, I think.
At least they wrote “'til” with one L. I’ll give them a pass here, as it’s an increasingly rare bit of adequacy.
I don’t know whether it ever took hold in the US, but “till” without an apostrophe is valid in the UK and not only is it not a contraction of “until”, it predates it and is the root of the word.
Thanks! TIL :)
till*
It’s also valid (and the standard form) in the U. S.
But the assumption it’s a contraction of “until” has been around for a while, I think.