• Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    14 days ago

    He was dying. This would likely have given him more time but not stopped him from dying in the near future. To an insurance company, these results are the same except that the latter case costs them more money.

    • Arigion@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      14 days ago

      You are also dying in the future. So no treatment for you. It’s even cheaper the sooner you die. And since you don’t need money after you’ve died, lets make your last days so expensive that we can extract all the money from you and if possible from the rest of your family. Profit.

      • limelight79@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        14 days ago

        Whoa whoa whoa. We can’t just let people die until we’ve extracted their economic output, up to the point where the cost of the treatment exceeds expected remaining economic output.

        • Tuxman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 days ago

          Hear me out… we could connect their brains to computers and keep them in a state of permanent office-hours where they fill in Excel sheets and write reports.