No but bringing that up distracts voters from the real, bigger and more legitimate issues. In 2028 a progressive black woman, or any other woman of color could win if they atleast act like they have good policy and optics like Obama. I firmly believe it and it wouldn’t be that close. Compare that to someone like Newsom, who leftists don’t even like, who we will probably get.
They are a big issue. It’s one of the biggest influences on a political campaign for president by a black woman candidate. I’m going to copy paste from my other comment below
When voters are presented with evidence showing that women political candidates garner just as much support as men in U.S. general elections, voters’ intentions to support women presidential candidates increased by about 3 percentage points, the researchers’ data showed
If they aren’t shown and it’s normalized that a candidate can garner just as much political support then it’s a headwind…
There’s also the belief I’m talking about where people say a woman can’t win, which becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. It also comes down to advertising and education (which are hamstrung by mudslinging during elections)
There are a lot of studies like this. I could go on for quite a while.
We theorize that one driving force is a paradox among Democratic primary voters: namely, that Black women are seen both as more liberal and less electable. Using two different survey experiments, we show that, while most Democratic primary candidates benefit from perceptions of being more liberal, this cannot be said for Black women due to beliefs that they are less likely to win in the general election.
These issues need to be:
A) recognized as real.
B) dealt with through education and normalization.
Ironically your style of comment is undermining A and B by saying none of this is real, and shutting down any conversation about potentially fixing it…
… our research finds that voters also withhold support for women candidates because they perceive practical barriers to women successfully attaining political leadership positions. We find that providing Democratic primary voters with evidence that women earn as much electoral support as men in US general elections increased intentions to vote for women candidates
This is supporting what others are saying, that this is a perceived weakness on women. The article you linked provides evidence that women DO earn electoral support, the sentiment that you’re sharing here is that this is just a big NO for women, when it’s proving the opposite, as the other person said you’re removing all the nuance and specifics of the links you’re sharing
No but bringing that up distracts voters from the real, bigger and more legitimate issues. In 2028 a progressive black woman, or any other woman of color could win if they atleast act like they have good policy and optics like Obama. I firmly believe it and it wouldn’t be that close. Compare that to someone like Newsom, who leftists don’t even like, who we will probably get.
They are a big issue. It’s one of the biggest influences on a political campaign for president by a black woman candidate. I’m going to copy paste from my other comment below
Here’s an article on what I’m talking about
If they aren’t shown and it’s normalized that a candidate can garner just as much political support then it’s a headwind…
There’s also the belief I’m talking about where people say a woman can’t win, which becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. It also comes down to advertising and education (which are hamstrung by mudslinging during elections)
There are a lot of studies like this. I could go on for quite a while.
There’s also a double bind racial bias where black female candidates are viewed as highly competent but unsuitable for a general election.
These issues need to be:
A) recognized as real.
B) dealt with through education and normalization.
Ironically your style of comment is undermining A and B by saying none of this is real, and shutting down any conversation about potentially fixing it…
Edit: grammar
This is supporting what others are saying, that this is a perceived weakness on women. The article you linked provides evidence that women DO earn electoral support, the sentiment that you’re sharing here is that this is just a big NO for women, when it’s proving the opposite, as the other person said you’re removing all the nuance and specifics of the links you’re sharing