• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I have a wall in my head that won’t accept this as funny because it entirely misses what Satanism is.

    It’s a response to Christianity, and in its oldest forms, Catholicism. So, the Latin bit should be the default. There wouldn’t have been Satanists that were using Aramaic or whatever. Hell, anyone engaging in the equivalent of satan worship from before the creation of satan in the form religious Satanists do worship could have spoken anything from their era anyway.

    It’s not like there’s a ton of examples of satan dictating holy (or unholy) books, but he/she/it would still have spoken the the dark prophets in their own tongue. Why the fuck would you speak Enochian to some random Babylonian? You’d speak Babylonian.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I mean (many of) the earliest Bibles were in Coptic (which is still used liturgically by some of the oldest Orthodox churches). Christianity also really inherited that form of dualism more from the Zoroastrians so Avestan is another great option. But if you want to come from the Judaic roots yeah babylon was the origin of the major opposing deities in Judaism’s early monolatrist perspective so especially if you’re fighting the Abrahamic God with Baal that would be your main pick.

      Side Rant: It really cannot be overstated how much the Catholic church really fucked up Christianity. It was originally a syncretistic anti imperialist death cult (in that you would martyr yourself by publicly accepting death over imperialism). If I ever got a time machine Athanasius of Alexandria is much higher on my list than Hitler. It’s not even that I’m specifically opposed to trinitarianism—the number three does seem significant to some universal truth across numerous cultures (Plato’s chariot, Taoist three elements of destiny, even Freud to name a few)—but killing people en masse over it is unspeakable. And to have subsequent traditions who were supposedly otherwise anti-catholic in any other respect still specifically follow in the tradition of murder for some reason is ridiculous.

      • tomenzgg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If you’re talking about the time of Athanasius, Catholicism doesn’t exist; The Great Schism hasn’t occurred, yet.

      • toynbee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Reading this comment finally helped me understand why new lemmings complain about the prevalence of Linux users here.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I was thinking more that Satan, as we know the entity is largely a product of creation grafted onto older things all hodgepodge.

        No reason said entity couldn’t adopt older languages if it was real, obviously.

        But, in terms of Satanists, they’re such a comparatively modern thing that them using Latin makes sense for multiple reasons

      • hansolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The Old Testament was written in Hebrew.

        The New Testament was written in Koine Greek.

        The Copts speak a descendant language of Egyptian.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Personally I’m more of a Peter was a Roman plant meant to subvert early Christianity into something more friendly to the Romans. So I’d just go and make sure Peter drowns or something. Either that or ensure that the Cult of Sol Invicta becomes dominant and ensuring Aurelian survives, mostly out of spite.