• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    It was too expensive. But so was the watch, and before that the phone.

    The difference with the watch is they figured out the health angle, and the phone’s value was obvious from the release (except to Ballmer and BlackBerry).

    • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I think the Vision Pro is especially too expensive though. Most people could swing $400-1000 if they really wanted something. $3500 is a stretch and starts to compete with buying a new car or remodeling the bathroom money, which is a lot for something that is not at all necessary to own.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yes. That’s why I don’t have one, among other reasons. The new phones are getting painful at half the price and do much more ( practically speaking)

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I think the real difference is nobody looks cool using VR/AR and how do you market a device that you can’t see when you use it?

      I used to work in VR and it was impressive how many people turned down demos. Everyone thinks they know what the experience will be like or are afraid of looking stupid swatting at phantoms.

      • thehatfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        I was at an expo once and a marketing guy I was with said similar as we passed a VR booth. He said that VR users looked like people flailing their arms around with buckets in their heads, and that it would be very hard to sell the experience to outsiders who hadn’t already tried it.

        Unfortunately it also seems the use cases are still fairly limited even when people do try it.

    • RedWeasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      Way to expensive for most. Meta has their devices under $1000 compare to $3500. Out of touch with rest of the market. Valve’s Steam Frame probably would be around/less than $1000.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      The phone was immediately useful once jailbreaking v1.1.1 through Safari happened. The apps and tweaks made my head spin with the possibilities. The general public needed the AppStore with v2 in order to see it.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          exactly, even just phone+ipod+safari was incredible in one device. Browsing the real internet on mobile didn’t exist before iPhone.

          also while the Maps app (with google maps at the time) wasn’t full-blown GPS yet that was also amazing having in your pocket.