We don’t usually take into account what employees do to nature on their spare time.
In a way, we would have to equate all the money spent on employees and what it is used for.
Getting rid of an employee would surely be a net gain for the environment, right? If an LLM could offset 50 employees, perhaps that would be neutral in that sense.
This doesn’t make a lot of sense, esoecially morally. We can’t really blame the company for what employees do out of work, can we?
We don’t usually take into account what employees do to nature on their spare time.
In a way, we would have to equate all the money spent on employees and what it is used for.
Getting rid of an employee would surely be a net gain for the environment, right? If an LLM could offset 50 employees, perhaps that would be neutral in that sense.
This doesn’t make a lot of sense, esoecially morally. We can’t really blame the company for what employees do out of work, can we?