If we realise that the “war on drugs” was actually the CIA’s war on the competition because counter narco insurgency is, for instance and purposes, indistinguishable from narco insurgency, the “war on drugs” was a roaring success. I mean, those illegal regime changes and death squads aren’t free, ya know.
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: March 20th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Subcultures. These days, it’s just an aesthetic choice.
undergroundoverground@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Jesus claps as he watches his Ma battle the devil
3·6 days agoYou’d have thought that depicting Mary pegging satan would get you burned at the steak in those days. Apparently not, it would seem.
They have eyes for nipples and nipples for eyes. It’s Titface!
Why would a war on the completion alone hurt the CIAs drug sales? Think through what you’re saying before labeling it in that way, just because you dont understand what’s being said. If your drug runners make it across the border without any hassle, you make more money than anyone else. It really isn’t as hard to understand as you’re making out to be.
Also, I mean the CIA literally ran the heroin game out of Laos and Myanmar from the start Vietnam war until they switched the base of operations of Afghanistan in the early 2000s. It’s how they paid for operation gladio and the illegal regime changes around the world, in the exact same way they flooded America with crack in the 80s.
It not making sense to you is a user issue.