

Aww, they failed to clone the structure of Reddit.


Aww, they failed to clone the structure of Reddit.


Nice. I’m considering asking mine, I use to have a prescription. Six years ago. But it wasn’t from a primary care doctor.


Was it your primary care doctor? Just curious.


Small teams and indies use things like photon to make multiplayer games.


Yeah. I have similar feelings. And I don’t think the social media fervor is helping things sometimes. There needs to be a certain level of precision in what is being asked for, and I see lots of broad statements about what laws should prevent from happening from random individuals. Using words like “kill switches” when required servers are taken offline. Or demanding every game have a direct networking mode or LAN options in addition to matchmaking or platform facilitated matchmaking.


Memory foam traps heat.
And is your blood sugar good?
It might not be either of these things, but they are worth crossing off the list of reasons. Along with what the other poster said about synthetic fabrics.


Wikipedia as a platform believes them too.


Archive dot is shouldn’t be used. The person who runs it is a nutter who attacks websites with it. They also modify archives.


lol, the UFO fringe seems to be what caused this to turn into a story. I like how it’s been sanitized for this post. It’s filtered through social media, then news nation, then Fox News. And now I’m surprised it’s on CNN and being posted in a science community.
The UFO community says one of them had a secret anonymous Twitter account that talked about UFOs. The account stopped posting when he disappeared. William Neil McCasland. They claim he would have been some sort of top dog/authority on the topic.
I wonder if it’ll continue to be covered. The UFO community is pulling in everything they can to link it to the story to make it bigger and more inclusive of more people and things. There are also MAGA republicans in the administration talking about it, and UFOs. It’s their pet topic. The UFOs sub on Reddit has little tolerance for anyone pointing out that they are interacting with the topic just to garner support and attention from a certain demographic of people.


Against the Vision Pro? Or did they just want it to bake longer? I think we can all see how that needs a second revision hardware wise. (Lighter, etc.)


I hope so, that’s good to hear. Some people seem so pissed off when making such comments about “useless” studies. 😔


Not proven until now.
These “duh” comments are always here in these situations.


They finally fixed the spam problem.


Nonsense. Until I see studies that prove such models of someone’s complex personality or behavior, I’m always gonna call bullshit on this stuff. Simulating someone based on only the outward symbols they produce does not construct a replica of that personality.


Some companies already use this heuristic to skip asking.


Platforms should always have that be the first check before falling back to multiple other data sources.


But Sama said it will cure cancer.


Beagle Lab mix
I’m willing to believe them, because if any of the security or safety issues are true, then they damn well better take careful action.
But if it turns out it was overstated. That sucks, and they deserve the flack.