Well, according to your definition, Israel is not an ethnostate, neither Nazi-Germany. In both cases, other nationalities are tolerated but with less right (i.e tourism, forced labor). So I do not agree with this definition, even though their is a national supremacy.
I didn’t mix the citizenship and nationality on purpose. People are radicalized even with citizenship, and th upper-class could access to citizenship even without being assigned to a nationality.



okay that seem to be coherent. We are used to define imperialism as “the system produce by the competition between states”. Some domination are note linked (or loosely) with market.
I understand why it’s interesting to focus on things we can fight on. But a lot of us couldn’t fight the financial market and it’s exportation. However we could blockade exportation of weapons, sending medic kit or foods to people that suffer from domination.
I’m not saying your definition is wrong, I’m saying that I found it ineffective for an international solidarity of the working class