i am getting increasingly annoyed by “Activists”.

Those people are just citizens living their life and making sure their elected government knows what they want it to do and what not.

not fucking “activists”. just people. as in “The People” who is the sovereign of any democracy. or Citizens, as we usually call them.

i think she’s talking about weed + Kebab. Maybe that doesn’t exist where she lives?

Statistics say that there is a decent amount of Boyfriends for who this would be an improvement.

Is that a threat?

I never had problems with feet, but i can’t wait until the current foot-craze subsides.
It’s like with everything these days. someone makes a mildly interesting/funny/sexy/whatever thing and for unfathomable reasons 12% of humanity or 96% of humans on the internet latch on to it and make it the core of their worldview/humour/identity until the next thing pops up.

STOP THE FEET

not entirely wrong, but you can drill your brownshirts as much as you want, most of them still will not kill a mother with baby, or shoot their own brother.

This solves that problem.

wrong text on the picture. that one should read: “getting 200+ gambling ads daily while having the gambling gene and not gambling anyway.”

The picture that goes with the original text would be someone not even noticing the bullets flying and missing.

And people say studying philosophy is irrelevant for every day life.
here we were just laughing about a bird / venting about a predatory species, and suddenly we are talking ethics and the question if moral(?) applies to animals when discussed by humans.

You are obviously right, in that i place my “pets” over a random predator. but then again, is the comparison truely equal if the heron is your “pet”? the fish seem to me pretty passive in all this, except in their inability to not attract things that want to eat them.

Is good and bad or right and wrong even applicable to animals in nature? and does a fish in a domesticated pond even fall under “living in nature”? would that even make a difference?

Or is the fault my own for not making sure the fish are protected?

Getting back to the beginning, do i have an obligation to moderate my language in any way?
Is it mean to wish for the heron to starve?
Could maybe a case be made that it is a request for poetic justice that one heron lives and a fish dies, and another one starves and a fish lives.

Philosophy is the shit.

I wonder if he used Gemini or chatGPT to generate the speech.

I wonder if the people defending the damn bird would have reacted differently if they had watched it pull a 30 year old Koi out of their pond and flew away with it.
I knew that fish for more than half my life. My kids grew up feeding and watching them.

There is always more to a story, and it’s good to remember that first impressions of a situation are often only that.

They are trying.

Life is more than just survival.

Well, i’m not munching on your chicken nuggets, am i?

exactly!

let him stand there until freezes, stupid git.
Probably the same one that steals fish from our tiny gardenpond.

Debian is the correct answer.

took you long enough.