

2·
1 day ago“There is precedent” is actually correct in this instance. Precedents is not though as it would be plural.


“There is precedent” is actually correct in this instance. Precedents is not though as it would be plural.


I understand that. You used plural when you should have used singular.
They said “there is precedence” which you corrected to “prescedents” but the correct form in the example is “there is precedent”.
Edit:
What’s next, are you going to claim “presidents” is another alternative spelling that means the same thing?
There was fuck all need for that. I actually mostly backed you up in another comment.


There are precedents. There is precedent.
Edit: changed i to e.


Bruh. If you’re going to correct, be sure you’re correct.
GET YOUR HAND OFF MY PENIS!!!


I have upvoted you many times for what it’s worth.
Precedents is not correct. Precedent is.