

The “old” clock app already had a Pomodoro feature (which I did not realize existed until recently) and you can argue this is a logical progression, I guess.


The “old” clock app already had a Pomodoro feature (which I did not realize existed until recently) and you can argue this is a logical progression, I guess.


Are there pornos out there with multi-day narratives that are longer than feature films?
There are. Streaming has apparently freed lots of genres of media from formatting / scheduling expectations.


A system prompt hints at local AI-powered productivity features, specifically optimized for students. For example, the Clock app’s Focus session will act as a ‘Productivity’ assistant that breaks down tasks into clear, actionable steps, and it works by inferring the task category, then referencing the coursework of the student.
It would be great if there were a way to use AI to help people learn more effectively. But this feels like a way to train young people to become dependent on AI assistance for tasks/skills we humans used to be able to do well enough without AI. An addiction, rather than an assistant.


The truth is treason. Lies are patriotism. War is peace. Freedom is slavery.


There’s a lot we could say. One thing that strikes me, now: In overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court delved way back into history, citing the non-binding legal opinions of a 17th century English lawyer (Matthew Hale). But in allowing ICE to run roughshod over the nation, they have ignored the Magna Carta (which is exactly why King Charles brought it up), which was actually English law, not just one lawyer’s opinion, and which unquestionably was a tremendously important influence on American law.
The Supreme Court has abandoned all pretext of being honest stewards of the law. They have no respect for the precedents set by their own judicial body. Their legal “reasoning” is just transparently awful cherry-picking and sea-lioning, and this is obvious even to amateurs and outsiders. They are legislating from the bench. They have discarded their own legitimacy.


It seems to me that the snippy responses in here are from people responding to the headline and an imaginary POV from the author. The author has thought about this stuff more than anyone commenting here has.


If I’m trying to juggle several pieces of information and/or tasks in my mind at once, those saved seconds are worth waaaay more than the sum of the time they add up to.
One of the reasons I was able to switch to Duck Duck Go as my primary search was because I could just type “g (subject)” to search Google instead. Firefox keywords are great.


First published: 01 April 2026
Now, is that cause for worry or am I silly?


He thinks we should be grateful that his ballroom plan wasn’t a hotel.
And this has bulletproof glass. This has you know, this is the highest level of security. Also, very importantly, I could have built suites on top. I could have done a lot of things. I said, no, no, we have this has to be pure. This has to be where people stay off property and they go through one very impactful, very strong entrance, one very powerful entrance. There’s no games with this.
And he refers to the ballroom that isn’t there in the past tense, already done.


What if he acquires a bespoke little toothbrush mustache and a forehead tattoo that says “pedo” all done in ink suspiciously similar to what’s in my favorite pen?


This headline suggested to me that the judge said this in her new capacity as a judge. That’s not the case, this is a statement she made in a different context years ago.
Which doesn’t make it normal or cool.


“You news people are monsters! For thinking I might talk about the news, here on the news talk show.”


There should be a headline like “Journalists Endangered by Presidential Visit”


LLMs are going to evolve into a position where being wrong sometimes and hallucinating sometimes won’t matter, because organizations are already built to deal with it: managers.


Are you aware of the “Multiple Clipboard” feature? Which is a deceptively simple productivity boost, a game-changer, a hidden gem in a sea of dark Windows patterns?


I imagine that “lawmakers” are going to find themselves more scrutinized, more surveilled than anyone else, because extorting them for information, favors, bribes and so forth will be much, much more lucrative than trying the same thing with nobodies like you and me.
This is an informal way of transferring state power from the people to “the cops,” in the broadest sense of that term. It’s the logic of the Mafia: If you have something on everyone, you have more opportunities to act through unwilling intermediaries.


They didn’t include this in the release notes? What in the world is going on?


OK that’s true, as far as it goes


The entire administration is exclusively “transactional relationships that pose a security risk,” but she’s a woman, so
Sure, you just have to finish the whole haircut in 25 minutes