

The URL made me skeptical, but that was an excellent read - thanks for sharing.


The URL made me skeptical, but that was an excellent read - thanks for sharing.


They have a collection of old FotL-logos in there, can’t really tell which one you’re describing.
Sounds like popping bubble wrap, or popcorn.


Because the writer is convincing themselves to take a course of action by looking at the worst case scenario and finding it not too bad. It’s meaningless to argue
“I should try it because this bad thing could happen”,
unlike
“I should try it because this bad thing is the worst that could happen”.


Jesus, that poster! I was sure the black woman was drawn by Rob Liefeld, but wrong decade I guess
To clarify, you get the slop if you click “View details about correlation #NNNN”


He should not be holding a sermon in the first place.
I agree.
That is the main issue.
I guess?
It is rather inconsequential if the goobledegook he says differs from regular sermon goobledegook.
No, I don’t think so. It matters whether he is sincere or just a grifter.


I think the issue was mixing in non-bible material, without disclosing it, during a sermon.
No, this is a new image - you’d notice if you compared them. Also, do you actually believe the slop Trump posted is effective propaganda to anyone but his cult following?
I can see being against this post because AI. Your point, not so much.
I doubt you’d get votes from the right, they fear socialism and other left-wing policy much more than they fear the Democrats.