The only oranges I see smell a lot like kerosene…

I have been using Jellyfin for over a year, brilliant thing. Makes it very easy to stream my media; I have one client catered to music, and the main one for movies/TV shows.

The secret ingredient is crime.
Nothing too serious, just send the kids down the mines and tell them it’s Minecraft.

(This is a joke pls don’t report me I may have 3 kids)

I can’t play an organ though, could I take the traitors drums instead if they have them? I could probably make a sick beat on those.

It’s good to know this is a turn on. I approach many animals.
Once a cat kept following me and I had to convince it to go back, though.
Another time someone’s cat just went to sleep on my lap, and I was late to college…
… And there was that one time I got chased by peacocks, squirrels, and random birds because I was feeding them walnuts…

Something tells me there should be a limit, but I can’t quite put my finger on it.

Unlikely. For films that are easily forgettable and barely spoken of even a couple of months are release, sure. For films people want to rewatch, still unlikely.

There are many issues with the notion of AI in film, however two things which may always be an issue:

1. the systems are built on what already exists. Actors over time have had the smallest quirks become iconic, often repeatable references in everyday life. From a perfectly timed wink within a specific context, to a sort of humour that the audience hasn’t been familiarised with in any way beforehand (or little enough for there to be no impact prior to seeing this hypothetical performance).
   Seeing these quirks repeated just do not, and cannot have the same impact in a new film if our subconscious is already within an understanding that what we are seeing has been done before.
   AI actors, by design, are only good for genericism.

2. AI is built on specific things, what it is told to do, and even if it does it well it has a great flaw that is going unnoticed by people praising the idea of using it: perfection.
   People are not perfect. Analyse any acting considered good, and the nuance within their movements, speech, and so on will be very noticeable.
   This is another flaw of the very design of AI: the aim, from the start, is to have commands produce a perfect representation of what the person wants, yet this also pushes the tool so far away from being in any way ‘human’, that it begs the question as to exactly HOW the use of AI will be so popular, if it’s made to be as robotically detached from the principles of the filming process (almost entirely)?

I just do not see AI being capable of producing an actor worthy of a mention. And this doesn’t even graze the arguments regarding the removement of passionate effort, which can go into the bulk of an essay easily.

Being someone who has to consume high fibre, as part of a medical condition, I cannot stress this enough: DRINK WATER, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD DRINK MORE WATER THAN YOU USUALLY DO!!!