does that even do anything other than giving an easy article for all the MSM out there

turds do not have any form to distort

we also like picasso

no you don’t understand this is literally skibidi toilet all hail

not necessarily

Beeple commented that “in the past, our worldview was shaped by artists” such as Picasso and Warhol. “But increasingly, our view of the world is being shaped by tech billionaires,” he continued. “Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk control very powerful algorithms that shape what we see and what we don’t see.”

they don’t have to shape it in a good way to shape our contemporary records

whereas picasso shaped the world in awe and warhol in consumerism, zuckerberg literally does it into consumerism

skibidi

interesting. I don’t think the article is saying “the real doomers are the CEOs”, though. what you’ve written in the second paragraph (and just that is incredibly interesting even if it doesn’t have the impact you’ve outlined. it’s incredibly Greek) is fully compatible with agreeing that AI is doomish. I’ll also repeat my point that the article advises increased caution more than before of tech’s claiming of great AI net benefits.

Have the comments here read the article? It’s arguing that the CEOs themselves have spread the doomer narrative and are now being molotov’d as a result. The subject of the title is/includes Altman, hence the Altman cover photo. This was way way better than I expected of Gizmodo (bravo Gizmodo), warning us that execs are only toning down their AI dooming for self-protection.

Whatever happens, it feels like the AI executives have painted themselves into a corner. They’ve told everyone their product has the potential to destroy everything. They were the doomers, if we want to call it that, at least when it was convenient. And now we seem to be entering a different era where the same people who told us about the dangers of AI try to get us to look exclusively at what they claim are enormous benefits for society; so far, with little to show.

@[email protected] @[email protected]

the photorealistic AI image model that they use looks scarily realistic

Each screen can now switch between any of the system’s virtual desktops independently

Huge for multi-monitor!

you are assuming that i am not agnostic. i am simply playing devil’s god’s advocate.

tl;dr: Matthew 4 covers that by saying don’t do stupid soot to test God

Then the devil took him to the holy city and placed him on the pinnacle of the temple, saying to him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down, for it is written, ‘He will command his angels concerning you,’ and ‘On their hands they will bear you up, so that you will not dash your foot against a stone.’ ”Jesus said to him, “Again it is written, ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’ ”

as a capitalist society they still need money to buy the resources. if they don’t have money then there’s not enough demand from them

sauce? there’s way more retired old people than unemployed young despite how the latter’s rising

seriously though excessively-falling birthrates mean less welfare available when we age into social security territory

my millennial friends all believe they won’t get social security (because by then it would’ve run out) because of falling birthrates

https://www.cnet.com/culture/windows-may-crash-after-49-7-days/