• Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Also your comment reeks of “they’re savages!”

    Maybe if your reading comprehension sucks, or if you’re overly sensitive to certain words

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        TBF, he didn’t say shit about them being savages. And he’s absolutely right that they were warring with only basic armament.

        Where you two aren’t meeting in the middle is that the indigenous people need to work out proper communication and organize against the invaders with adequate gear. That’s kind of a big ask. To this day we’re trying to keep nukes out of the hands of warring nations and those people are decidedly not savages.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not - suggesting that Native Americans weren’t/aren’t susceptible to human flaws is foolish at best, revisionist history at worst. If anything I did not show nearly enough disdain.

        Were aspects of their cultures superior? I believe so, they were certainly better stewards of the earth and sexual violence was very much taboo. However they were also warring, scalping, and enslaving each other for a long time before white men showed up.

        Does that mean they deserve genocide? Unequivocally, no. Effectively asserting that they aren’t human simply because the person you’re disagreeing with used terms you dislike is silly. Would you have rather they typed out ‘Native American on Native American’ war? Would that hoop being jumped through suddenly make all of this make sense to you?