• Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The left part is only true if the roofing has to be built explicitly for the panels. There are already covered parking lots, I can’t see any downsides in just adding panels on top.

    And I doubt that it requires longer cable runs than panels somewhere on a field.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for solar and wind. Put those panels everywhere possible, the more the better. I just don’t get why even having this discussion.

    • paranoia@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The structure for solar panels is much heavier than for pure sunshade, as a person will have to walk on it to install and maintain the panels. You also have to deal with the associated health and safety regulations for working at height and live electricity, as well as probably pay more for insurance since there is an increased risk of fire.

        • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          And for roof solar, we are not running out of space for them anytime soon. Plenty of buildings still haven’t install them.

        • Tobberone@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I agree, multiple land use is the way forward. Solar panels for their own sake is seldom good enough land use, even if may be cheaper to set up.

        • paranoia@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, I do, and I have good reason to, because I am a structural engineer and have designed them myself on occasion. A lot of these canopies over car and bike shelters are just a sheet of plexiglass.

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Where are you designing these that they don’t need to support hundreds of pounds of snow or rain, or stand up to hail?

            • paranoia@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Northern/Western Europe.

              Hail bounces off, rain flows off. For a very light duty structure like a smoking shelter, bike shelter or trolley corral, they sometimes have a curved plexiglass roof that snow can just fall off or be blown off. A person is a much more intense load than snow (a person’s whole weight can be on one foot). The frame might take it, but the cladding may not.

              Usually they are just a product off the shelf.

              • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                My parents just bought and installed a small off the shelf carport, it has its own built-in gutter system and the ability to hold 100s of pounds on its metal roof. Nobody is covering cars with plexiglass, that would literally defeat the purpose of having shade.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                No it’s not, if you asked to have a roof installed and someone installed a fucking canopy over your house, you’d be pissed.

                This is like asking for a truck and they show up with a station wagon and tell you well it’s got foldable back seats.

                Words have meaning.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          They don’t build parking shade roofs to support the weight of being covered in panels, though. That has to be planned for. A typical panel that’s around five and a half foot by a bit less than 3 and a half foot weighs around forty pounds. Having like two of those on your covered spot at your house would probably hold fine. But to a large parking area will add a huge amount of weight.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s more of an awning than a roof though. Plus that picture shows that this was specifically designed with the panels. As those are just straight solar panels and not roofing that’s had solar installed to it.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They likely won’t be able to take the additional weight of the solar panels, according to code anyway.