sanitation@lemmy.radio to me_irl@lemmy.world · 3 days agoMe_irllemmy.radioimagemessage-square175linkfedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageMe_irllemmy.radiosanitation@lemmy.radio to me_irl@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square175linkfedilink
minus-squarePieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 days agoJust using a number is a bad metric since CoL can make such a huge difference. 100k in rural low CoL areas would set you up pretty well. In SF or NYC, 100k is consider to be “poor”
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 days ago$100k - now - is considered “poor” in a lot of places :(
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoI hate to break it to you, but it has been for a long time in the right place is in the United States.
Just using a number is a bad metric since CoL can make such a huge difference.
100k in rural low CoL areas would set you up pretty well.
In SF or NYC, 100k is consider to be “poor”
$100k - now - is considered “poor” in a lot of places :(
I hate to break it to you, but it has been for a long time in the right place is in the United States.