• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In this case the evidence is literally first-hand experience. There is nothing that will change my mind on this because it’s my direct personal experience from actual use.

    I honestly don’t care what marketing says, and if other people have different experiences then that’s just them. In my personal actual real-world experience I found that they let me get tons more done and their quality of work is perfectly fine as long as you’re using the right tools and giving them the right instructions.

    The article says that developers are disagreeing with that in situations where they are “forced” to use AI, and that’s fair, it doesn’t make sense to force a tool to be used for something it’s not good at. They might be using it wrong. I use it whenever it’s better than not using it, and that ends up being quite often in my workflow.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      Unfortunately your being downvoted by the echo chamber participants that have to make sure you know that your opinion is wrong and theirs is better. AI is a tool, just like my impact gun. Yea there are times where you absolutely should not use an impact gun on something, but it’s THE tool for some situations. And yea, using an impact gun where you should t will get you in trouble just like using AI in situations you shouldn’t will get you in trouble. There is nothing new on that front!