sanitation@lemmy.radio to me_irl@lemmy.world · 15 days agome_irllemmy.radioimagemessage-square123linkfedilinkarrow-up1891arrow-down138
arrow-up1853arrow-down1imageme_irllemmy.radiosanitation@lemmy.radio to me_irl@lemmy.world · 15 days agomessage-square123linkfedilink
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down2·15 days agoThose who use the verb discluded should probably be discluded. Even autocorrect discludes this as a valid word.
minus-squaretoynbee@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·15 days agoThose who don’t embiggen this comment should be discluded from consideration.
minus-squarenaught@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·15 days agoBut what if OP remains intragnisent?
minus-squarekieron115@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 days agoFrom the context it is clear what you mean.
Those who use the verb discluded should probably be discluded.
Even autocorrect discludes this as a valid word.
It’s perfectly cromulent
Those who don’t embiggen this comment should be discluded from consideration.
But what if OP remains intragnisent?
From the context it is clear what you mean.