• cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    secrecy orders have been imposed not only on inventions affecting military defense but also on those alleged to threaten economic stability, with critics noting that many such restrictions rest on speculative or unproven harms.

    But also

    The law applies broadly to all inventions in the United States for which a patent is filed or granted (35 U.S.C. § 181).

    So if you really do have a society changing invention - one that could upset this capitalist or neoliberal world order - it is your duty to publically release it and not patent it

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’ll suppress it unless they can make money off it like crypto or “AI”.

      • survirtual@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Bitcoin was publicly released with full code and no pre-mining. It could not be patented for this reason.

        The original creator is still unknown and has never moved their coins.

        This strategy is the way.

  • mrductape@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Anyone want to bet that there are inventions that are great but would cost some people serious money and that’s why we’re not seeing them?

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not taking that bet. From the linked wikipedia page.

      According to reporting in Wired and Slate, the United States Patent and Trademark Office has at times considered applying secrecy orders to inventions deemed disruptive to established industries.

      You may be sure that there are times when they did more than consider it.