Their lives are blissful… free from the burden of self doubt.

  • PugJesus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Most people mean ‘worked’ as in ‘functioned on a basic level’ rather than ‘survived outside military pressure’, though. When they say “Anarchism doesn’t work”, they generally mean “Anarchism, as a socio-economic system, is inherently non-functional” rather than “Anarchism can be destroyed, or has never lasted against outside forces.”

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      In such a cutthroat (and often outright evil) world, though, it needs to be able to last against outside forces in order to work.

      The outside forces will never stop, so unless we find a way to overcome them, lasting anarchism will never be achieved.

      • Zombie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        To be fair, almost none of Europe survived those same outside forces a few years later. With the prior warning of what happened in Spain.

        1930s Spain is where the Nazis practiced their Blitzkrieg technique, before using it to control almost the entirety of Europe.

        The political systems of Czechoslovakia, Austria, France, Luxembourg, Belgium, Denmark, Greece, Netherlands, Norway, etc aren’t called into question in the same manner because they couldn’t resist the German military machine so why should anarchist Spain?